I've been in the UK for over 5 years, and never seriously took all the negativity towards BT, the main provider of telephone connectivity in Britain. I thought: OK, I understand that BT is a huge organisation, setbacks are inevitable, but surely they must be trying?
In all my time in England I have lived and worked in Manchester (with a brief period in 2007 when I commuted to work in Warrington). I used to have a family, and where we lived with my husband's parents they had two landline and broadband packages, one from BT, another from NTL. Neither ever had a problem.
After a substantial amount of time together, my husband and I split up and I eventually moved out in May 2008 to a flat in Manchester's city centre that I rented through an agency. I had quite an adventurous 2008 when I broke an ankle, lost the job, and then only recently was able to start working again. I love the job, and things should finally start looking bright everywhere.
Sadly, they aren't, and currently it is thanks to BT. When I just moved in, the landline wasn't active. I decided to extend the rent after 6 months in October 2008, and then I finally called BT to activate the landline. With the view to save on phone calls, as well as to get a proper broadband (I am using o2 mobile broadband, as I am writing this).
I have not checked if, and how, people are narrating their experience of BT service. There were a few terrible stories about various experiences in Britain that I could tell yet never did, since I have always considered them a part of my private life. This, however, is an altogether different situation. To begin with, since September I have been paying for the landline I cannot use. I have called BT a few times about this which always resulted in them giving me one same advice about how to carry out a socket check to see if landline is working. [They are supposedly trying to save my money because if the fault appears to be with my phone equipment, then they will have to charge me for having no real reason to arrange an engineer's visit to the property]. There was also a brief period of time when I carried out a different test and was able to use the landline - until my neighbours activated theirs. I checked with my landlady who lives in Australia, and she assured me that she has never had any problems with BT landline while she lived in the flat. I also know some works had been carried out at the building where the flat is. In short, an engineer's visit is very necessary.
On April 1st 2009 I booked an engineer to come and check everything BT-related on the property. I work full time, so I booked him on Saturday morning. And he didn't come. What is more, half-ill and coughing on 6 of April, I spent the entire afternoon talking to different BT people about this. Hopefully, the arranged visit will materialise (for which I will have to stay off work in the morning). But it is annoying to see that BT stubbornly doesn't want to visit the property, insisting that everything works OK on their side.
The situation is annoying and disheartening, especially because no-one can do my job for me, and staying in the house waiting for an engineer (who may well not turn up) is OK, apart from the fact that I have to do it in my working hours. That means I need to request the time off work. Since BT have their own working hours and a terrible reputation (which is now confirmed), my company would be understanding. But it doesn't mean they would be approving if I begin to stay home regularly to wait for an engineer. And the experience of booking and waiting for an engineer on a Saturday has already made me doubt BT's reliability.
As I said above, I have always been sceptical about the negativity towards BT. And even until this Saturday I was ready to forgive and forget. Now my trust is shaken to the point when I write this post and compare my experience of BT to Jeff Jarvis's Dell Hell. I call it "BT Pity".
Want to know details? Jump under the cut.